Design Estimate
- Custom design: ~2.9 months
- AI-accelerated design: ~1.5 months
- Two design delivery approaches
Website design & development proposal
A structured redevelopment of DMD Consult’s corporate website to create a more premium, international, and scalable digital presence — with a stronger content architecture, clearer presentation of services and expertise, structured People and Projects content, and a platform foundation that can support future growth.
A focused delivery team with one primary developer per implementation option, supported by part-time QA and project management throughout the engagement.
Roles, engagement level and timing across both implementation options.
WordPress or Frontend Developer · Full-time throughout development
QA Engineer · Approximately 10h/week, with increased involvement around final validation and release where required
Project Manager · Approximately 10h/week throughout delivery
Delivery Foundations
A commercial comparison of the four proposed design and implementation combinations, together with the recommended CMS direction, indicative recurring costs, and the assumptions that may affect final price or programme.
Recommended implementation baseline
For the currently confirmed corporate website scope, Custom WordPress provides the clearest balance between required functionality, delivery effort, editorial familiarity, operational simplicity, support-provider flexibility, and whole-of-life cost. The recommendation is based on proportionality rather than on WordPress being technically stronger in every category.
The figures below provide an indicative baseline for third-party platform, hosting, and licence costs based on the currently proposed implementation setup and current public vendor pricing. Conditional services are shown separately and are not included in the baseline totals.
12-month renewal pricing used for the annual baseline. Includes SSL, CDN and managed WordPress updates.
One-site licence for structured fields and content relationships.
One-site baseline licence for contact and recruitment forms.
Indicative consent-management baseline for the current website scope, covering up to 350 subpages per domain with no traffic limitations.
Reliable SMTP/API delivery for website form notifications. Brevo Starter is used as the pricing reference; the final provider will be confirmed during Phase 0 based on the selected hosting setup, expected email volume, deliverability requirements, and any existing email services.
Planning baseline assumes three paid Editor / Developer / Admin seats. Viewer seats do not consume paid seats.
One deploying team seat is included in the platform fee, together with $20/month of usage credit.
Same indicative consent-management baseline as the WordPress option, covering up to 350 subpages per domain with no traffic limitations.
Reliable SMTP/API delivery for website form notifications. Brevo Starter is used as the pricing reference; the final provider will be confirmed during Phase 0 based on the selected hosting setup, expected email volume, deliverability requirements, and any existing email services.
Pricing assumes no material hidden dependencies are discovered within the current WordPress, Divi, hosting, form, or deployment setup. Additional legacy constraints identified during Phase 0 may affect migration or implementation effort.
The baseline is based on the currently understood reusable template scope and limited migration support. Significantly larger volumes of People, Projects, Insights, Vacancies, Offices, or other structured content may affect population and validation effort.
Search, filtering, office-location functionality, forms, and content relationships are estimated at the currently defined corporate-website level. Advanced search, complex filtering, geolocation, custom animation, or deeper workflow logic may require additional effort.
External CRM, HR/recruitment, advanced search, marketing automation, personalisation, or other API-based integrations are not assumed unless explicitly included in the final scope.
The baseline assumes selective migration of approved current content, standard redirect planning, and technical SEO continuity. Broader archive migration or substantial legacy-content restructuring may affect scope.
Programme timing assumes timely access, review feedback, platform confirmation, and progressive availability of approved content during implementation.